Disposed

Soniya Bai v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC8 Aug 2009WPS/6761/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh addressed a writ petition concerning the non-payment of retirement dues. It directed the State to constitute a High Power Retirement Dues Committee to review the matter within 15 days and issue notice to the petitioner within four months of the order's receipt.

What did the court decide?

Directed the State to constitute a High Power Retirement Dues Committee, which must issue notice to the petitioner within four months for consideration of the non-payment of retirement dues.

Soniya Bai Vs State of Chhattisgarh and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2009)

¶1

I N THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH

¶2

AT: BILASPUR OF 2007 W.P. (S) No. G 7^é/

¶3

PETITIONER: Smt. Soniya Bai, aged 60 years, wife of late Shri Mahjuram, resident of village Goriya Dadtoli, P.O. Manora, District Jashpur (c.G.).

¶4

VERSUS

¶5

RESPONDENTS:

¶6

State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, (1) Department of Veterinary Health Services Mantralaya, Raipur.^/ (2) The Director, Veterinary Health Services, C.G. Raipur. / (3) The Joint Director, Veterinary Health Services, Bilaspur (C.G.)^, x The Deputy Director, Veterinary Health Services, Jashpur (C.G.) / The Joint Director, Treasury, Account, and (5) Pension, Bilaspur division, Bilaspur (C.G.),

¶7

¶8

WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRIT, ORDER, DIRECTION.

¶9

The petitioner most humbly and respectfully begs to submit as under:1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER :^- As in, the cause title mentioned above.

¶10

PARTICULARS OF THE RESPONDENTS :^-

¶11

As in, the cause title mentioned above.

wwgméw

111200}

Mm (Wu)

mw‘iz‘wh‘ wmm	mmm	WWW 1 WWW $3ifmm
	S.B: Hon’ble Justice Mr. Pritink 08-08-2009: Shri Somnath Verma, coun Shri Sumesh Bajaj, Govt. A With the consent of learn heard fInaHy. The present case pertainst Shri Sumesh Bajaj,‘ Coun Government has already constitut and the said Committee is duiy e of the petitioner. Let the petitioner tile a' re make a request to the office of the writ petition for forwarding the s within a period of 15 days from th On this being done, the Co and officers concemed within a f shall consider and pass order in opportunity of hearing to the p concerned may file additional doc including payment of retiral dues, within a period offour months fro With the above observation	r Diwaker el for the petitioner. vocate for State/respondents. d counsel for the parties, ^{the matter} is the non-payment of retirai dues. ' el for the State submits that the State d a High Power Retiral Dues Committee powered ^{to consider the cases like that} resentation to the said Committee or to Advocate ^{General along with copy of the} me to the Committee. Let this be done date of receipt of this order. mittee shall issue notice to the‘ petitioner rther period of 15 days. The Committee accordance with law aher affording due itioner. The petitioner and the officers ments, if necessary. The entire'exercise if any, to the petitioners, be completed the date of receipt ofcopy ofthis order. , ^thispetition ^{is disposed of.} Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge r

Soniya Bai v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Soniya Bai v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State of Chhattisgarh and Ors. Vs Rajendra Kumar Chandrakar and Ors.

Brijbhushan Singh Sarwate Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Ashim Mukherjee Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Nitin Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Ku.Neema Kewat Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

B.L. Dewangan Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.