Dismissed

B.L. Dewangan v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC8 Aug 2009WPS/4180/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition challenging a transfer order. The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the withdrawal of the petition with liberty to raise grievances in the representation decided to be made expeditiously before the concerned authority.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise grievances in representation to be filed expeditiously.

B.L. Dewangan Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors. — Service and Employment | Chhattisgarh HC (2009)

mew.^men

€-

‘1 Qx?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH^ATBILASPUR (CHHATTISGARH)

¶6

w.P. s No. \A‘bQ 2009

¶7

PETITIONER :

¶8

/ B. L. Devangan, S/o. Bisahu Devangan, agcd about 57 years, Asstt. Grade — II, Pairi Canal, Water Resources, Sub Division No. 2, Panduka, Distt. Raipur (C.G.)

¶9

VERSUS

¶10

/(1) RESPONDENTS:

¶11

State of Chhattisgarh, through its Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Raipur, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.).

¶12

/ (2)

¶13

Engineer in Chief, Water Resources Department, Raipur (C.G.)

¶14

, (3)

¶15

Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Mahanadj^— Godavari, Kachar,^Raipur (C.G.)

¶16

WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

¶17

W WW’?L3DK¢L8 r 200 ?

¶18

mm (Wu)

¶19

aréwmw ammm	WWW	WW1?§Q%W amimm
	SB ‘ HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE PR 08.08.2009 Shri Vinod Deshmukh, cou Shri Ajay Dwivedi, Dy, G’A, At the outset counsel for t present petition ^{with liberty to} fi No.1 raising all his grievances ^ag dated 30.6.2009. He however su directed to decide the representati Counsel for the State has the petitioner is decided by the with law. Accordingly, the petition is;	AITINKER DIWAKER usel for the petitioner. for the State. he petitioner wants to withdraw the ie representation before respondent ^{ainst the impugned transfer order} bmits that the said authority be an so made expeditiously. no objection if the representation of authority concerned in accordance dismissed as withdrawn with the
	liberty as aforesaid.	, SCI/- Prinker Diwaker Judge we. it

B.L. Dewangan v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.L. Dewangan v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State of Chhattisgarh and Ors. Vs Rajendra Kumar Chandrakar and Ors.

Brijbhushan Singh Sarwate Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Ashim Mukherjee Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Nitin Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Ku.Neema Kewat Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Soniya Bai Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.