The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the State's writ petition as having become infructuous after regularization of the respondent. The dismissal order was signed by Justice Pritinker Diwakar on 07-08-2008.
The writ petition was dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR
2.3>38 WRIT PETITION N0. /2005
PETITIONER (S)
\r
^'
/^/
_^<-^/"
^w
,./"
r' State of Madhya Pradesh (NowChattisgarh) Through Secretary Water Resources Deptt. Mantralay Bhawan Raipur, Chhattisgarh
Sub Divisional officer Water Re$ources Division no.2, Bhatgaon, Tehsil Kurud, Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.)
^x
^
^^^ II
...-'..^.
:J?'^
[^'•^
VERSUS
Superintending Engineer Water Resources Division no.1, Raipur(C.G.)
RESPONDENT(S)
Distt. Dhamtari (C.G.)
/
3, Presiding Officer Labour Court Raipur(C.G-)
APPLICATION UNDERARTICLE THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
7227 OF
^^T *;:?:rpTR^T, ^TTI^^Ko, f^rray
^^^^.W.,ft...N.......^.M8/......^2005
fe -W^T'17^F (^Aq<i?)
|^??t?r^Tl^NT
^srr ^n^t SF^NT|"?"CTWflf^T CT^T|^Prf^^T'RTR^rf^fecstTf^T^R
i|7-3?f?R 3TT^T|
|---|---|---|
|D/-|t
S.B: Hon'bleJusticeMr.Pritiiik
07-08-2008:
Shri Yashwant Singh Thal^
State/petitioners.
Shri M.K. Dubey, counsel^
Counsel for the petitioner|
petition the respondent No.
1 |
petition hasbecome infructuous.j
Accordingly the writ petiti|
infruetuous.|erDiwalwr
ur, Deputy Advocate General fbrthe
orrespondent No. 1.
B submits that as after flling of the
ias been regularized, therefore the
on is dismlssed as having become
Sd/-
PritinkerDiwaker
Judge|
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition has become infructuous due to regularization of the petitioner.
State of Madhya Pradesh (Now Chhattisgarh)
Rajendra Kr. Chandrakar
Pritinker Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
