Prithvi Sen Tigga Vs State of Chhattisgarh and… — Education and Admissions | Chhattisgarh HC (2009)

Prithvi Sen Tigga Vs State of Chhattisgarh and… — Education and Admissions | Chhattisgarh HC (2009)

c^ i^7

IN THE HIGH COURT OF .TTISGARH AT

BILASPUR (C.G.)

W. P.(Sl N0.^2^6/2009

PETITIONER

Prithvi Sen Tigga,

S/o - Shri Julious Tigga,

'kNNlN^

Vs>
^7.^/
^y^<
.^/..^
^/f/y
.<^;.
,<^ s>' /
^

Aged about 46 years

R/o Village - Karradand, Distt. Sarguja Presently working as Upper Division Teacher in, In Middle school Durgapur,

Block - Preznnagar,

Distt. Sarguja, Chhattisgarh,

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS ^' 1- State of Chhattisgarh,

Through - Secretary,

Adim Jati 8& Anushuchit Jati Vikas Vibhag,

D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya,

Raipur, Chhattisgarh,

2- Collector,

Ambikapur, Distt. - Sarguja, Chhattisgarh,

3- Block Education Officer,

Kusmi, Distt. Sarguja C.G.

WRIT PBTITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPMATE WmT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. CERTIORAm^ETC.

'C—78

^^r ^ii^id<L!, ^Ti1^i4i<o, [®!<ni<H^<

. t^PS^ ^>€>^

W^I^IS 5hN8^

3^TTPRT ('ic<i^<(T)

3TI^T^?Jf^[W ^m3:n^i^^i^	'FTOR^ftH^II	^ft^^N^R .'^'3tfOT3^T
	SB: Hon. Mr.JusticePt 08.08.2009:	itinkerDiwaker
^	Shri NeerajMehtacounse) Shri Sumesh Bajaj GAfor **	** Challenge in this petitior
	Contention of the couns^ present place of posting the after being promoted by contention is that wife ofthe pef	and is working as Shiksha K^ Doomarpali, Block Prem Nagar. p^
	Counsel for the petitioner make a suitable concerned which would be dec^ proposition of the State counsel] his agreement. However, he pr^ representation of the petition< concerned. respon i	pents/State submits that let the

'ta-^

-4-

^ ^- ':^

"g^ -^iiqi^q^ ^Tl1<H41^/ [^^11H^<

'STPTW^^W •-^200

	3ff^TTT5RT(1^t3^	?)
3i7T^?T^I'ft^W 'cCT 3??^T^RW		•WifeNhTnq?ff-iffe^^R?R ^^RR^i^T
	Accordingly, the petition is the petitioner makes a represent within a period of 10 days from order. the authorities conceme^ furtherperiod ofthreeweeksfrorr order impugned shall be kept in ^ petitjoner.	ation to the authorities concerned disposed ofwith a direction that if the date of receipt of copy of this shall decide the same within a thedate ofitsreceipt. Tillthenthe beyance so far as it relates to the Sd/- PritinkerDiwaker Judge
		i^a^ Copyw^ o^-r *&^,^0.^03 m^^m^^^^ the Sespft^^^t,..o') (^^)<^ <<?? ^- ^L. ^° 1f m^^^o^ ^s^tra- Sd/- A.R (J) ^L