Dismissed
Madhusudan Das Vaisnav v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
Chhattisgarh HCWPS/2753/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
O RTOFTCH‘H’ATTISGAR‘H ' A W 337$ /2009RIT…
What the court decided
AI extract
O RTOFTCH‘H’ATTISGAR‘H ' A W 337$ /2009RIT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
'A 'i B‘EFOREJTHE: HON'BLEHIGH O RTOFTCH‘H’ATTISGAR‘H T: W RIT "PETITION-gosg‘);:N‘o;_‘ 5§337$ _ 7/2009
PER:TITIONE
=Madhusudan Das Valsnav
arayn D as Vvausna
out 3O years 'R/ /o‘Co‘Goal p RS'id,aone' N ear Fan Fa'co‘r‘ty, PanaritaraaurdihRip, (C).G
«ERSUVS: '
m,
State I ‘ of Chhisghattar tghrouh teh Secretary, Dpteartmen ’o f Hlthea & Famlly W elfarei DK.S..;
‘ iVM edIca COIIeeR‘aiU'rC.gp,,G‘.e
4 W
5 L? NW2 Wm 200a
avian m (We)
ammw&#$ mart m straw 3mmmhmmm§haddmat
nut m m é; 31’1”?!“ m
S.B: Hon’ble Justice Mr. Pritin ‘er Diwaker
04-08-2009:
Shri Alok Dewangan, coun ei for the petitioner.
Shri Y.S, Thakur, Dy. Ad v ate General for the State;
Counsel for the petitionel submits that as after filing of the
petition, the very advertisement which has been questioned in the
petition has been cancelled, t herefore the petition has become
infructuous.
Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as having become
infructuous.
Sdl-
Prltmker Diwaker
Judge
l
Madhusudan Das Valsana
State of Chhattisgarh
Pritin V Diwaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court