Application for restoration of Writ Petition (S) No. 6841/2006 dismissed for want of prosecution was allowed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh on the grounds of bonafide reasons.
Allowed application for restoration of W.P.(S) No. 6841/2006 to its original pendency number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
^~r T
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH /\J (\c} BILASPUR fC.G.
M.C.C.NO. ^tS^ OF 2009 Raocl
APPLICANTS : 1, PETITIONERS
•^^
'pc^rf- s^-9"y
_..-'l .^^
h**<. ...•••^^<^•
^''^'";^<^-.
^
^
Arjun Prasad Mishra, aged about 37 years Son of Shri Ramjilal Sharma, resident of Amaldeeha, Post Dullapur, Tahsil Pandariya, District Kabirdham (C.G.).
Narayan Prasad Sahu, aged about 43 years Son of Shri Serma Sahu, resident of Village Kapadah, Post Chilphi (Bangla), Tahsil Pandariya, District Kabirdham (C.G.).
Ramesh Kumar Sahy, aged about 33 years Son of Shri Raghuwar Sahu, resident of Kapadah, Post Chilphi (Bangla), District Kabirdham (C.G.).
4.
Rambhadu Yadav, aged about 42 Son of Shri Biru Ram years Yadav, resident of Ghadoli, Post Chilphi, Tahsil Lormi, District Bilaspur (C.G.).
VERSUS
NON-APPLICANTS: 1.
RESPOMDENTS
State of Chhattisgarh,through the Secretary, Department of School Education, Dau Kalyan Singh Bhawan, Raipur (C.G-).
APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF WRIT PETITION fS) N0. 6841/2006
r"
—78
-ysEf «4|<4H<4, ^^41<o, [®ldiy!j,<
^,^ o^'
^-.........M..C.c.:....^..<?..., 'TF^ZOO^ <<TOOI «»NSC|»
<sn^T 'q^r (^f^^)
| ^l^T 'SFT fa-3'icb' '^n^n^T^^w |
'^iTW^f^^H^ 03.08.2009 »?^»<^: |
',a,a.i^,i,t^^^E^».:A:& ^6^4i^W^ff^f'fe^ <M^K ^3<RR-3TT^T {s- |
|---|---|---|
| <. ! . |
Shri ShailendraSharma, cc ShriAnrind Dubey, P.L. for This is an application for r4 which has beendismissed forwanj For the reasons assigned i the case, this Court is satisfied th on accountofbonafide reasons. Counsel for the State has allowed. Accordingly, M.C.C. No. 28 6841/2006 berestoredtoits origii |
[^
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for restoration of a writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution should be allowed on bonafide grounds.
Arjun Prasad Mishra
Narayan Prasad Sahu
Ramesh Kumar Sahy
Rambhadu Yadav
State of Chhattisgarh
Pritinker Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
