Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 concerning an agricultural land acquisition appeal. The petition was dismissed as it was withdrawn during hearing so no detailed summary of reasoning or outcome is available.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
drékéig W.P.No. orzoos.
‘ PETITIONER
VERSUS
’/
$ I
“
g 0 fb§ETITION UNDER ARTCLES 226 &227 OF CONSTITUTION
$e INDIA
OF
DETAILS OF PETITION: -
XI—HC—22
ww,m,f%mmg{
Wm
. v..m;.€..d.9;.%M€S’/or
WW 200
m
Hun...“ “no... .
Wan WW§WW
WW Wmmtm
WW %a¥%q3n%3T
’§ 2mii2m‘?
3r. a men‘iiw being made ”me case is €akar: up fosr hearing.
Shri HE. Agrawai, 3?. Advoca’ie wkh $h¥i Fas‘aka AGfawaL
Counsei for the petaienef.
Shri Emmi: Verman Page: Lawver far {he $tate§fesnondent$ No. 1
ta 4»
‘me
Learned coansei fur geiiEii/qar pray§ wEhcx‘rawai oi? Sims
petétiqm.
‘/
Nat obposed. Coasidei’eci.
w
Pe‘ti‘iéan is disméssed as wi thdrawn.
Sd/-
V.K.Shrivastava
Judge
(11%W)
Shyam Mohan Agrawal
State of Chhattisgarh
Additional Collector, Rajnandgaon
Divisional Forest Officer, General Forest Division, Rajnandgaon
Board of Revenue Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
