Dismissed
Abdulla Yusuf v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
Chhattisgarh HCWP/2878/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
CHHATTiSGARH: BiLASPUR <S»n"!iai I-t&n/'-h •…
What the court decided
AI extract
CHHATTiSGARH: BiLASPUR <S»n"!iai I-t&n/'-h •…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HiOH COURTOF CHHATTiSGARH: BiLASPUR
<S»n"!iai I-t&n/'-h • M^n'hlA ^hri /i\sv l^iiiwar <£hrlt'5i<&fai/a -t ^^irgiti. fif^rii'^'s* * • t^r •i»l^»^^«*<ji »•J'MJr * »ti«rj<«**^riii iV^ut^vH'irO) v
WR!T PETmOM N0.2878 OF 2005
Ahri-lla Vrniif r^tj^auiia i U^ui
Versus
State ofChhattisgarh & Othsr
~thORDER (Passed on 3'" day of February, 2007)
AF^
H!GH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH: BiLASPUR
Singte Bench : HOn'b's Shri Vijay Kumar Shrivastaya,
WRiT PETITiON N0.2878 OF 2005
Petitionsr:
Abdulia Yusuf, S/o Lats Abbas Aii Aged about 74 years, R/o Baidev Bagh, Raj"andgaon_(C-G)
Versus
./
^'
ResooRdsRts 1) Stats of Ghhattssgarh through Secretary Department of Town & Country P'anning DKS Bhayan Mantraiaya Raipur (CG).
Assistant Director Town & Country Planning QE Road Rajnandgaon
Present:
Shri Nssiabh Dubey, counss! for fchs pstitioner.
Shri AS Kachhavraha, Govsrnment Advocate forthe Ststei'rsspondsnts No.1 to3.
Shri Sanjay K Agrav.'a! and Shri Saurabh Sahni, counse! for respondent No.4.
s.:-^:
ORDER -*R (Passed on 9'" day of February, 2007)
This pstitson undsr Artids 226 of the Constifertion of India, sseking
the fo!iowins rsiisfs:
"Quashing demoliBor. nofce of ths Commissioner of Municipal Gorporgtion dated 1-7-2(M5 bsihg Annsxure P-1 Oas s'lsga! and invaiid."
admeasuring 722 sq. mtrs. sifcated atG.E. Ro&d, Rajnandgaon. Petitionsr
in the yesr 2001 fited sn application before the Municipa! Corporation
(hsnceforth "the CorporaSon") Sesking permissien to consfruGt a building
o
,.<-—
ovsr theiand. Vide permtesiori dated 10-4-2CSS1 the Corporation granted psrmission in accordance with various conditfons !aid therein. Ons of the conditions was that, the construction djivMivi»kAlrl I^nW /4^kdons after teavini g an arsa of 22.50 mtrs. from the mid-road. When construcSon v.'as sn progress, the Corporation, finding viotaSon of psrmission, issued notice directing the pstitionsr to construct the bui"!di.".a in accordanc®wifh Gondition enshrinsd in ths permissio",. That notics ••••'as repissd by the pstitionsr vids tetter dated 31-1-2002. Petitionsr in his repiy statsd that teaving 5 mtre. of his fand he has started constructi'on and in cass hs is asketf to go bshind, he wi!! go back volunteriiy on hfe own risk. Ps{!t!onsr •A'SS again sewsd 'Aith notice ^rfa+S^ ^-7^nn? !!!^?'|nf ^/W+iin!.n '^ft? A^fh<& ft^P/r11/^ M!f»i^Ersi!s! r^^ri^Ar-a+E^n &'*• uuiis^ ^-* ~^^//£, Mitu^i ^^^H/ij A/? vi iii^ Wlf~~f^\S ivi^iiiik/ijJGi K^iu?i ji/vi ctiiiVii /'i^t, •'tQKCt,i^ih/ih? \iVifff\r ti/i^VityKr^'./ifi' U,j<?"fhs nvi,&?*t ^Q^C)>\i^/w / <nti.t-f ^h^yta*Siiyw '"t!!^^^xil.urf^ ^A'fr>»'Wiiy UiiuUUivii^^y! fn^!! i^ri'/s''( k^?<^t*"l /fi'M^ o|^A|i|/4 w/t+ 1^^ r'an^.'^&^ 'vi i^H iM^'uirfj i rfiivUiW iiVl i/^? i^iiiW<?vi.
'V\•.'/ D^tW^tV^iri-^Ui.iViis?i iiiIt^ +ttAiij^ \tQ,J9ry^<fti ^/VIO^./\f&, ^(^t-'aiin<iy«Miij •o»^i^l?.e.»(Oii/ji/ii^^l ff\rivi /»tft^ri+yiuili. ^vfvj i/UJiuiii;^M ttl/'fli^, ^nnie^i^r;iiiii<3»»iviiff^rivi ''^n'rfM^Vfi^UU^Uviii?<4E^sn ^fVi fhsuivs e&y\r<^!s'ff^VijM ftf^f^riiWi viif\n ^7-^'5^f\CY?j f~ i<-~£WA.. Thaliis? <?'ai/«td»uiu app!ica{!OR '.vas considsred and psrmission was granted vide order dstsd 1-1-2CX53 sufcyect to condiSon fhat he w", mske constTuCtion sfter teaving f'j cn mtrs. from the middls of the road as the road width is 45 mtrs. !t K pertinent to msntion hers that ths Departmsnt of Town and Gountry P.'anRina aiso objectsd ths sarifer consfructson and for subsequent cORStruction put a ridsr that the pstsftonsrshould msks construction tea<v'!"ng 22.50 mtre. from ths middte of the road.
•^tf^\ iDaftfiy\n^r^iiHVjx-i uiWr<!i?J r<^+iiVi, vt/jc^rirtK*^'** fhauw3 f>!iinii+i7vi.iiiyiiy A:'fvi wViiwiHvitO^^?<<n!ii/M^a iiiipV^i^sUi»lnr»/^^^<I K*/fc?y f^""kUi^ ^f>tipif/^r'intfvf\i^<w»vi|i/vj«tHVji iiiir< 1/UiiUiiiyfrtftiMin/r f^rtirn^Ii&oii/M^jk/<?i iiii^ajyii. n<?UiO. ii**a^Y»u0 tiyuiiin^iitrt f'^^r^t^^i^?iVii?< \»tM^Wiui »t/^<lt^k^sii< /4<a(v\i ^^^»'7^/^C J'»IA?*|K' efr'l('lf'in^i +hQ+ tirf^ \ft^o r^^ti iIrA^I t/» wni^L'n /•/iiytff+n *^*4rS/Mi^ f/^*stMt^/< ^w-4i.W«b/^j^uify ^iiHiijjy Ui«Sit i i^? Vrud i<?<Uiiii?w iv iiiur<; Wi JSliUiLdiUi i j^?< area 22.50i.wv^n ^tfrJ^ii>Ui».mt fr<"s?»»iiviii f!^<auiW mi^^it^iiijMwi^ ^^Vi f^aUiS? rA^>^<|ivfiU. , r'^MHVff^i!3a+if^^n^r i^?i/il^?Urar^!iA?4 fAiv +I^^tUis? li^i.i^v.M/'^<»^ iU'^i'ir^iuviijy /vif^^i^c'iff^-ir^,^ i^iu^i <?w +HAui^^wiii^i/^iiUviiisio^*>ytA i^<^<'if'i^i»'^r f.»'a»VTUO ^t^'ainf<aM6iiii ft^!^n»ii^/«IS^siViyU t.an+HYviiji i^.n+^^^ rt^t'^&fl ^ _7_'?^nC i»s ^sfvl^r t^\ .rir^st^t /M^t^Ar^ ii^ihr /'f l^^'sri>>»j"< +/^ ttinn iiiiwfhi. rA<"t'»r/it +A ll.^w i-/-£,w^»iti viuci IV yKiiii, Vjwrji/vi iiUjiifcy Vi iicCiiiiiy tv iiiiii ¥^iU(| i^yciivi i.v
/.. Tt-
remova! of unsuthorizsd construction under Ssction 307(2)(3) of the Act, 1956. Petitioner failsd to shov.' sufRcient cause and atee did not removs the unauthorized construcSon, thsrefore, his unauthorized constru'ction 'A'as iiabte to bs rsmoved. After due considsrafion in order to rsmove the ! lin'^1 lf'^»/MiT»//<(//M^<?l'r! l/'+lifMn /^-F +I^A l^^^+tf'I.AI^Ar l^»l»i»»/^f^f\v^, ll^ 4 7'f 7ft' e'fv nntn jt/ii&^u ^/Vi i<>u Uk/UVi i Vi Mi<s? j/^uuvii^i iidViiiy ^*vif<tf iii i f i.rv ^Sij. of ths iand,.CRs! impugnsd noScs has beer, sswed on him.
v/fi\ C/\fi-Vi (^y/M^A?|>/i vpiSi «KK'•»!^ll'^'^'?'?ttI'ftF<^^i""i^i i ir^fvj +ttAU JS? ^itie>»^rrfnwi^t/uii;? »ir/'»iHei/M^<?'pi s?vj^*t/i j^> A»^<^tt»-Ii^/^l^i i^i ii ii isu i f^/^ji^r ti5^i^uk/ii&^a?-tiAnc <?Q"^rf.^^/ +Aiv ^^QQ7 ulJ?, %/Vf^H7 ViAf+b^iii^; r^^i,A^.f 4QCi£^i??^?? ^e.IS rAniiir&^IiS\4;uiiS?u i-AiV K^ij^ /Anc.;.f4ArA^4LfVii5iy%?iSy iwiij •f^ !^+?Ar ^n/'f ^nirit A|i 4'h?^<£i& nfi'M"^^!'^^ ^•**'A ^O! tA+^^1 I^^I^ita ' ii.d l<i7U<;i C(ij%< ^ji/iiii, r-iii Uiv<><? |i;iV¥i^iViidui^ ^uvl%?w w^ivW .
"283. Prohibition of erectio". or re-erecSon of buHdings v.'ithout permissiOR. - (1) No psrson snall -
© vlvf^f. erect or vf rs-srsct iW-^iv\fi any buiiding; or
(ii) i/vjcommenceto i jj i i^i i^r^; iv <?ierect ^irfi, or rs-erect any buiiding; or ^\r (JiO maks any msterial sxterna! aiteration te any building; or
y¥//»»A ^*/»r«?+yi^vi i&u Lj^ri,i/<+ ^Visr r^_f*-f\v^tvti s?-k/vi i^tj t^i^i,t^*+ sny j>/i/j<?Mtiiiyisctins portion of a building whjch me Commissioner is smpowsred by ssctio" 305 to fscjuire to bs sst bsck or is empowered to give permissionto ^pnstruct or re-construct, — i( .
^
(a) untess ths Coromissioner has eithsr by an order jn writing granted permjssion or has failed to iH^msts within ths sfsscribsd o©nodhis "sfu^sl of permission for the erection or Te-ereCtion of the building or for the cOnstructjon w re-construction of ths projscting part ofths buiiding;i^inn' ^p
(b) after the expiry of one year from th®date of the said permission or such longer peripd as the Comniissionsr "n3y slEow or from ths SH^ of th@ prescribed period, as the case may be;
Providsd that nothing n th i s section sha ii appiy to any work, addition or alteration whicn the Corporation may by bys'awdec'grs to bs exempt.
(2) !f a quesSon arises whether a psrticular alterafion in eraddition to an existing ouikting is oi- is not 3 nistsria! sitsrs^on ths nisttsr wit! bs ifar?¥»«n^i"iH*i? +^A ^ftvti USi.^iijjjiityvii uy ui<? v/^iii4j iiii i iii <» ^twiitSi^ii
(3) Ar.y psrson aggrieved by ths ordsr of ths Commissioner in this behaif may appeai to the districf court withi" thifty days of such ordsr in th@ manner prescribed therefor and the decision of the district court sha!! be final.
/9\ I."/ an appiication in writing for approva! ofthe sits toflether with a site plan of{heland;and in the case of land which is ths pfQpsrty of fhs Goysrnment or Qf the Cprporation, a Certified cqpy of tne dbcumenis authorteing him to occupy ths land, and if so required bythe Commissioner the origina! document or documents;arid
(b) an appiication in wrftins for psrmission to build together with a groundpian, elevation and section of ths buildifig s"d a spscification of ths' work to bs done.
(2) Ever/ plan of any bu';!ding te bs constructsd wholiy or partty of masonry, submitted under subSQC^'Q" ^I1) shsH. in toksn of its hsyinG b©srt prepared by nim or undsr his supervision, bear the signatiire of a liwnsed surveyor. (3) Every document submittsdundsr sub-ssction (1) shail be prepared in such manner and shaii coniai" such particu'arsas "'ay bsprescribed. )
(4) Nothing hereir. contained sha!! rsquirs a person tocompiywith theprovjsions of ctause (b) of sub-ssction (1) unti! such time as the sits^ has^seen
approved by ths Commissioner or such person as he may appoint.
^
(2) TheCommissioner mayrefusstosanctionthe erection or re-erectiQn of any building if in respect of ths byileliFtd th©r©srs suflicisnt rsssons whfch shsf! be communicated in wriiing to the appiicant, why sanction shou'd not be g'ven, or ifthe land on which ;{!"s propossd to srsct or re-srsct such buHding is vested in the Governmentor in the Corporation and the cbnssnt of ths Govsrnmsnt or ths C-orporation, asthe case may be, has notbeen obiained.orif ihe tJUe to the !and is in dispute betwsen the app!lcant >rl +hA r^^m^r:^r!^<^r - iaT«/M^sfinn .At" i^/^t" TW^ f/^ ^,f\f^miHM^v*< j%* uW v-'vilxH/j^Uvii vi U i<? .?WSjjiiiii>?iii,.
(3) iiivMMfiUM^1tr."'tt»e^l»^i»tll^^l« i.aitfii iwii iy ui^&i^i,«4't>I»tr< iyu iii iy ^<%^vcontai"iSd in subsection (2) but subject to the provisions pf subsscBon (10) of SeGtion 2Q1 if the C-ommissionsr within thirtydays of the receiptfromany person pfa valid notice of such oerson's intention to erect or resreet a buiiding, or within sixty days ofsuch rsceipt if the notice relatesto a building on thesame or part of ths s3fns sits on which ssnetion for th©srsctton of 2 buiiding has bssn rsfysed 'ATthinths pre'^ous tweh/s months, negiects or omitsto pass orders sanctioning or rsfusing to ssnction sych erQctiQR or rs-srsctio"; such erection or re-erection, shaii, uniess the iand on which itis propossdto erect or rs-erect such building beiongs to or vssts in s Corporation, bs deemed to have been sanctioned, except in so far ?is H" mav nnntrawianiiavwt lai *N »a^, ttrf anv•oi ij Ynila^^i *<>•»// nirt^f •i»jirf>**»»huolaiw or»»i *•*any <J town pianning scneme sancnQned under this Act or any other enactment forthe ttme beina in foree:
Providsd tftat if an order granting-or rsfusjng such sanction issuspended under Section 421 the psriod sp8C!fisd by this sub-ssction shs!! conimence to run afresh from ihe date of communication of finai ordsrs under the said sanction bv the Govsrnment.
29S. Orounds On which sifs of proposed building may be disapproved.--The Connmissionsf niay on 3!! pr a"y of th©fo!!owi"g grounds refusedto approve the site on which an proposes to erect or re-erect any K! iti/^y\f. ii/uiiviii iy~-
(a) that ths srsctiOR or re-ersction of ths proposed buiiding on such site would be in contraysntion of a tow" planning schef"s under
l^
Section 291 or of any othsr provteion of this Act or of any other enactmentfor the time being in force; or
(b) that ths site is in a portion within fhe limite of the city in which the Rosition and direGtion of the strssts hsvs not bssn dstsrniinsd snd thst ths buiiding 'A'hich it fe proposed to ersct on such site will, in the opinion ofthe Commissioner.obstruct or jntQrfere with ths CQnstfuctloR I" <ytur©of sultab!0 streete in such portton or with ths dramags, 'A'ater supply or ventilation thereof:
A-
D r /S* n.^f^^^I i-iWiw^u ' ovided thatany person te whom permtesioR to ereGt or re-erect a building on such a site has J3QQ" rsfussd nisy. fcy wnttsn notics to ths Cpmmissioner require that ihe position and direction of streets to be latd down in future jn the vicinity of ths propossd buiiding shou!d bs forthvAh dstermiRS, and it such requisition is notcomplained with within QHQ yggt ITO"T! ths dafs thereof, ni3y, subjeGt to a!! other provisions of this Act applicabie thereto, procesd with ths erection of his building; or
/r-\ I.W that ths sjte has besn reciaimsd or used as a place for depositing sewage, offensive matter or rubbish or th©carcassss of dsad anin'isls or is otherwise insanitarj'ordangerousto healtti; or
(d) thst the site i's in a portion v.";th!R the iimits of the city for which a tOwn planning scheme has not ^Qgn ganQtjQnecj by ths GGysm"1isnf 3"c! thst ths buiidingwhich it is proposed to erect or re-wect on suchsjtewil, jntheopinionoftheCQmmissioneF, be iiksiy to conflictin a raanner, to be communicated in writing to the applicant, with the provisions of a town nianntnn <aftnoma-'lwr'"'
Pr^rt"?4&<4Provicieci +h.-sttf.at any person to whomi»t*/^»viin>iperrnission to erect or re-erecta building on sych a site has bsen refussd msy, by writte" "otics to th® Commissioner, require that thepreparation of a town pianning schems for the portjon in which the s.ite is suitabte sha!! bs procesdsd with as eariy as possibie; and if the atwlicant is not informed in ".'"ting ".'ifchi" tl"s!"§ months of ths dats of ths requisinon that the Goyemment have sanctioned the said town pianning scheme, he may, subject to a!! other prowsfons of this AcS appiicabte thsreto proGeed with the erecnon or re-erection of the bui!ding in rsspect of which ths spptjcstio" wss made. 287. Grounds OR wbich (^rmission to erect or re-erect building may be rerused—tl)The Co"im*ss!onef shsil! notgrsint psrr"!ss!on to ©rsct6r re-erect any buiiding unless and untii he has apprwred ofths site thereofon anjipplication under SectionDJ £.W.294.
'7
(2) The Commissionsr shal! not grant permission to erect or re-erect any Dujlding,—
(a) if the plans and specificatsons submittsd •A";fh the appiicatjon show that such buiidinfl is not in SCCOfdSRCS WJtfl 3 IQWR DlSHfllflG Sf^lSHflSd sanctioned under Sectibn 291, orWitn any provision of this Act, or any ru!e or byelaw mad®thereunder, or any provision of any iaw for ths time bsing in torce; or
(a-1) if in his op iniinionthe ersction or re-ersction of such building would be a nuisance or injurious to the inhabitants of the nsighborh.ood to thspub'ic; or
^»
(b) u i ktA< jii«?SS ui k»<^I iu uiiUitii'i+il •?»niL?utiy nf»»ne|^i<ajj3i) ei^n^ifi^^+i/srko3'ii/^^'iii^rtitUviid ^siv* particuiars calied fpr by him are supplied.
(2) !f a buiiding is erectsd or re-srected—
(a) wifchout any sanction as rsquired by section 293(1), or
(b) 'lwil<?jjr'hiiQn <l"3»%^<+i^M^Si<ti jihrUvii i^tc>iitiitf kn?oiifri^»/\»<r.nftt^/^jpti^iy&^w, /^rVi
t' :1
't'tt^ *oir»y»e ^vF ^gini.r e^t^y'1'i/sn (c) in cont{ravsntion of thsu fiS termsuSil i i0 Vto fii iy Stiii iii^Uvi i granted,or
(d) when ^-'>y?*4'^S!'*iiruvii ii€%^>hse j<i*|i/5f^w!J'*t^*sArl viiiU^i> irt^i^f <'Aj~ti^<kn^^ik/UVii ^/W)
the ComraissioRsr, unlsss he deems it nscsssary to take proceedings in respectpfsuch building orwork under sect'on 294, sha!!-
(a) by'.vritten notice, requirs the psreon who is erectingsuch buildingor executing suchwork orhas srectsd such buHding or exscutsd such uiork on or before such days as shaii be specified in such notice, by a statement in writtng subscribed by hjm or by an agent duly authorizsd by> him in that bshaif and acklressed to the Commissioner, to show sufHcisnt C3US0 why such buiiding or worR shsHnot be removed, aiteredor putlea.dQwnLO!L,
(b) shail rsquireths said psreon onsuch dsy and atsucn time and place as snall Despecmed In sucn notsce to attend psrso"a!!y or by an ageRt du!y authorized by him in that behaif.and showsufRcient cause why such building or work shal! not be removsd, aitered or puiied down.
(3) !f such person faifs to sho'.v sufficient cause, to the satisfaction of the Commissioner, why such building orwofkshaHnotbe fsmoysd, atsrsd or pulied down, the Commissioner may remove.aiter nr pull down ths buHding or work andthe expenses thersof shail be pajd byths psrson.
(4) !f the pfans ars (spproved) by ths Commissioner and the approval iscommunicated to ths PQFSQ" intsndlRg to bui!d ths houss or if ths pians are rejeciea' by tne Commissioner bui no notice of thsir reisction is aiven to Derson intendina to to buiid ths house within ths prsscribed psriod if shali not be open to the CommissJoner to give a "otlcs undsr syb-section (1) ssnd (2) on ths ground that buiiaing is arectsd or re-erected in contravention of any schems or byslaws or any othsr requirsments under nderthischspter.ipii
(5) NofrAithstanding in this ssctfon sha!! affectths rightoftheCorporationoranyotherpersontoapply frofhio D'slrict Court fpr srs .'"junctio" fofihs rejnova! or aiteration of any buiiding onthe ground ttiat it contravsnes any provisjons of tliis Act or the byete'.vs mads thereundsr, but if fhs buiiding is ons in respect of which plans have been deposited and fhe plgns hsvs bssn psisssid by ihs Co'nmissionsf, or nonce that they have been rejeeted has not been gjven wthin the prescribed period after the dsposit thersof, and if the 'Awk has been executed in accordance with the pians, the District Court on gfantiRg 2" jnjunctiQp shall have power to ordsr tha Corporation to pay to the owner of the work such compensation as ths District Court thinks just, but bsfore makj,"g any such ordsr the District Court cause me uommissioner ir not a party to De joinea ss 2 party to ths procssc'ing."
Upon conjoint rsading of aii thoss provjsior.s, !t unveils that the l;ommis3ioner^n^i^ hnas no power or jurisciiction!c:?<!!^+iAn fiftto accord-B^^ftr^"! n^pe,''m!3S!on +^{o construct a buiiding in v'ioiation of to'A'." pianning scheme sancSoned undsr this Act, any rute, byeisws or any other enactment for the tims bsing !R
forc9.
tW
Q
.-'T-
beiow:
"25. 'ith ^rviiiviiiiii,; devslopment p!sn.-(/•IV After the coming into force of the cievelopment plan, ths us©snd dsy©t(?0ms"tof Isnd shs!! confQriTi to the provisions of ihe deveiopment pian:
(Providsd that the Ziia yojans Samffi, may, as its discretion, permit the continued use of iand fpr tho ffWffWWniirrwae IVfnif iwhifh<1III'WI Ihtt ••<»»utfcit? awrhoinf*ig Mi/»/*ai!«aari af•<» thQ•11 t */ tim<sw«'w of the comirig inio operation of the deveiopment nlan'y Provided furthsr that such permission shall not be grant^a tor a penod exceeding seven years fr-om +hs jjg^Q Qf comihg into opsrstion of ths devetopment plan.
(2) Not'A'ithstanding anything contained in section 172 of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1Q5Q '""' '•**"^' /No-20 of <•" 1Q^^ •»"»'/WWJ eyerunsnmissiQn ffVtffWW to f.V »It»^t«,.-II-*« granted under that section shaii be subject to the nrovjstons of this.Act."
7h&t 1 K? fiiwwflHftva r^r^i.."^^?'i/lwj^ivij ''!&<**'lvvis?ai ijf ii/uii>Ksr*? \ivj?*Ar>sfr! i£i»HuvijVi !?f?ftn i vUis7iWii>^?^ihA^j>n<aA +^''>i^uitiiii ii
accordance 'A'ith the dsvsiopmeRt pian in foree. Thsrsfore, Commtesionsr,
Coi-poratio". was not empov.'ered te grant psrmission to construct a buiiding vwi?»'^r ^Au i<? itfiiiui!snrl ia.'h*^KVviii^it €af!ei^iiS ""tHi?»tViitiHi +!^^Hi>^ »/ioviii^i!Nkr/^/in'» vi^? nrAnifse'A/'!ih/iUi/va%?U jr/'i's/'livtity -•aw^tuiiu i.?l?k/\F^II"^r«l.< - i<*^ ii^/»iinn^^nf iin^Ms 1»>!»»+A /<tra»^+ i^i^rrvti^<^iAn TiiVt»/^»i>^^ ii. Kiru^ iij^ujjiii/i^ijtUji/vji iiiiii iV yiuiit, pwi i i ii&5ivi i iiiipv&iriy 'i^?I^H'+^?* +^'?if ^'Mt^+l^! !^+>^M^ <sl^^!il.rf ^^ iw^^f^/^ S^^\fir\fv ^'7 C/1 »v»+r<? ^^f W»/^ I'ai^; ^rViiuiUvii Ui<;.ti. k/viiiauu^uvii &ii^wiu w iiita<S? iSuviiiy ^£.^»vliii.iS. vi iliS? fr^wfiviii m?^/*!!^iUiuUi^ ^ffvf th-auW r^^t^ivuu.
A^
o
Without prior permission of ths Director, in writing. CommissJoner, CorporaSon granted psrm-'ssion on 10-4-2(x31after recsiving no obj'scSon from the Nazui Deparfment and ateo msRtioning that the psrmjssion !3 subject to AdhJR!y3m,19?3. Evsn in specific tsrm it has besn msnttoned that it is necessary for the petifioRer to compiy MP Co!onyAdhin"/am, 1988, MastsrPlan Proposa!, 2001, M.P. Land Devetopmsnt Act, 1984 and rufes framsd thereundsr. Hs v/as aiso directsd to observe Shs rutes regarding environment.
Jt
4/^Vi// Gj^i'Wf^w^.ff*'i-^?iiijVii^t ^ ftir^l^/^rjwii,i(t?t j»j"iin+An+I'\»<^'Viji.^iju'^ji l'3i?e +(Ti<>attiitSi fr/MiwtiiVHi +t%Ai.ii'i? <4a+^tUdi<? '•'iA^ iUiuiiliirti+I^>( (^^r»¥t?ojei^iir<ji/^jttiiiy^iVii +^^Uj^? </Vi/^^m^r^+i/\n|^viciit/ii <*+n?+A'^Suiii I'tfM )neit*+i»t.niliSiSUijyUjtfii, +fc(^+ tt»AUJ*?^vii3iUUk*uvii^i^M^e'l'rt in+i>»n h/iI^A f4f\n, t/yl»t? ^Lift^i^Fi i<>Mi«rip<r« iiiy litt^t+(,ji(fiii fr/snniiViit t'ts^ui^ u^i/i.ftit+j^r iiisj /\ft/i +t^Aui'Vf cn-ntrtiiicaiJi r^/a^'1ivtfiu IIHUii <a*» /4iu'fr^j]n/»Awi2fuaiii/ii? ^vfvi| '*?'££>^>/i mtrs. no construction be done. Ths land betongs to hjm and Without acquirina hi's iand Gorporation has no right to imposs condjtjon, dissnfiUing
p-
1 1
tti»v»iiiiii f-/^iv rf^ni/^ir^siijvy l^ie^ili5f "iiul'at^/4 'a/^'vi^ooiuUiiis7Utyuiiiiy irirt.rt 'lif7'1 <?/<(Svi. fy^trt^itiua., iitrhViiiuuiiy t^iilk* ii,if" i^te tv^^lir^^'*ijs<ti^^v acquisition of !and. On the other hand, it '.vas opposed by tearned counss! fer the respendente.
»M-/^hil^ito /i/MTi^tn i.»4i/^in fitfrii/M i+ ^«t<t» i^Ari^ <<•<<•t^rt A*^M 11) La'.v t/ivi iii./ita LiVi i^u uk/Uvi i iMfiutVUi wM^ p^i iiii5>^iiVii iivi the Commissioner, C or poration and Com.-nissioner has no right to srant permission against law of ths land, thth s refors, in aceordsRcs with [aw he ^'lirAr^+^k/4 <Ik/^uiv yvuuviwii^^s4111'i/>i»^^r +/iIV ^/^r'o^yik/vjjSHu^ii "lt t^^Uiok/uiiuilI'M iiMiyi^t »»fi'^t» 'ft/sy 1/& avms 22.50 mtrs. .1iivlii iiiiviviis? iddte of the road. The land stiil bsiongs and ovms to ths pstitionsr, it x^r is not taksn a'.vay by the Corporation State or other authoritiss. E?A^fri^fi<"in'uvii f^rivi ^^n^t?'^ViiSUu^iivJiws?i!^tf'i^*n f\f^f '!i 7'1i s *>f<?i>4. ?¥+'»iiiUiy. ^fVi +hQUj<? juiiw,I?*?"^ "jhi^Hvifiii^ii fa!!cjd ^s'!Wlliiit ^^ iK,f\ *Vt*^+A»1^ fr.n»V* 4I^^» Mnlr4/^t^ fvf *'ino>?<! h^to l^^fan innnftCA/4 in 1^*'. &.^.>/v tij^i^i^ iiviii Hi^ iiiiuUi^? Vi iveu iidS y^s?i ijjlj^us^w iii VMVaccordancs A";{h !aw. Certainiy in accordance with Devstopment Piar. the '.wdenins of road wi!! be carried out and in ^>?»/./M-^|^>r».r^ukrt^Vfuuti^^;accordance U!ti'^¥¥iUiitiiYv'i-'itifl* tii^MMi^iUviiflt/ri ic+iy>in A'FVi K.iiiu(•'s»%/i| rillWiii t^skA required.
1 •">
andis bound by the ia'A' of iand, thersfers, dsiiberate disobedisnce of !aw and v,4!!fu! dsfauit which amount to kssp ths petitioner in a cafsgory of iaw breaker, has no righf to sscape from dsmoHtton of his unauthorizsd eenstruction.
1 '!.
j-^i
-<
•^'
Plan, 2001, therefors, h& has no tegs! right to protect his unauthorized construction, hsnce ths Court is not obliged to step in under ArScis 226 of ths Constitution for his rescue. Here again, it is not out of ptece to msntion that the disput®arose in the year 2001, but ths petitioner siept over it, therefore, the insiant petition ateo suffers from unexpteined delay and iachss. Even otherA'ise, ifhe has any grisyance, he shouid have taksn r^r»/Mir^<is +/s tt i?» ^a^i/t/^r/'l'iii^/../^ iaM*l^ +1^/» &.f^t •I QdfS /^r .nl'i^^iwn&^t U/^ it^^fc ><? kv ii. iit dirf^vi ^jtfii iv^ tViui Uii? /3&»ii i'irw Vi vHis?IWiS%y. F~iv iii&i^tiiU, ijin!!'Fi itti^ /4io'^!^'^.i/!»t^li +h^ .I<>a ^i'P l^n.'^ rvt^^4<> iin'Mitti/^ri-r/s^I \i^f\9i^<!'tiri t^f'lf\v f^.^Rv^f^ iMfiiiiuiiy sii^vk/^ylj iy Uit; idW vi itfiii<Ji, iituvi^ Uii^iUii ivii^<s?u WiiSu UViivii, it?<?fiiia h*i^*^allf 'aKTt*.'^ fh^ l-'>ix' iiiiii^<?it tiiww i.iii.? i<aW.
15} Por th @e for saOtrsaegoing reasons, the petition dsssrvss to be dismissedand is according'iy dismid^is^t.<?^.^^J Mfti~ij/ vfi/i>l<>./*/<?te Sd//-
Sd//-
/ V.K.Shrivastava
Judge
Gowri
"'1--~
1 issue framed by the court
a mapping error in the source text incorrectly assigned an monetary-benefit subject to a property dispute judgment.
Abdulla Yusuf
State of Chhattisgarh
Assistant Director Town & Country Planning
Collector Rajnandgaon
Municipal Corporation Rajnandgaon
Vijay Kumar Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court