Allowed

Prabodh Chandra Hembram v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC20 Aug 2024WPA/20308/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court directed State to pay 7% annual interest on delayed gratuity and pension retirement dues from due date to actual payment, unless delay was due to petitioner's lapse. Order also directed action against officers for such delay.

What did the court decide?

State directed to pay interest @ 7% p.a. on gratuity and arrear pension from due date till actual payment if delay not petitioner's fault, within eight weeks.

Prabodh Chandra Hembram Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Calcutta HC (2024)

¶1

66 20.08.2024 d.p.

¶2

In The High Court At Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side

¶3

W.P.A. 20308 of 2024

¶4

Probodh Chandra Hembram -versus

¶5

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶6

Mr. Manaranjan Sahu …For the Petitioner.

¶7

Mr. Dipendu Nath Bose. …For the State.

¶8

Affidavit-of-service filed in Court today is taken on record.

¶9

The petitioner was an Assistant Teacher of a Primary School who retired from service on 31.05.2020. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Pension Payment Order was issued on 10.05.2021 and the gratuity and arrear pension amount was disbursed to him only on 12.06.2021. The petitioner claims interest on delayed payment of the gratuity and arrear pension amount.

¶10

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and considered the orders passed by this court in similar facts.

¶11

It is settled law that the right of a retired employee to get his retiral dues on the date of attaining superannuation is a valuable right which accrues in his favour on the date of his attaining superannuation. Further, gratuity and pension are no more considered to be a bounty to be handed out by the State at its whim.

¶12

¶13

An employee has a statutory right to receive gratuity and pension upon retirement. If payment of such gratuity and pension is delayed the retired employee is surely entitled to get some interest for such delayed payment.

¶14

In the present case, it was the bounden duty of the State to disburse the gratuity and pension amount on the due date. If it has failed to do so and has released such amount after unexplained delay, it is obliged to pay interest to the retired employee. Pension and gratuity are welfare provisions aimed at maintaining the life of a retired employee and his/her dependents. This is compensatory in nature.

¶15

In view of the aforesaid, I direct the concerned Treasury Officer to pay interest to the writ petitioner at the rate of 7% per annum on the gratuity and arrear pension calculated on and from the due date till the date of actual payment, provided the delay caused was not attributable to the petitioner.

¶16

The Treasury Officer shall not be obliged to pay interest if the delay was caused on account of any lapse on the part of the teacher.

¶17

Such payment is to be made within eight weeks from the date of communication of the certified copy of this order to the concerned authorities.

¶18

The concerned respondent authority is directed to take appropriate steps in accordance with law against the erring officer(s) for whose fault there has been delay in releasing the retirement benefit to the petitioner.

¶19

¶20

Since no affidavit in opposition has been invited, the allegations contained in the writ petition are deemed not be admitted.

¶21

The writ petition stands disposed of.

¶22

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible.

¶23

( Amrita Sinha, J.)

Prabodh Chandra Hembram v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prabodh Chandra Hembram v. the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sumit Pal Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Tumpa Saha Vs State of West Bengal &Ors

Sangita Singha Roy Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Niranjan Kanji Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Rukshmini Mondal Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Ajit Kumar Pain Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors.