The High Court of Calcutta dismissed Writ Petition No. 17499 of 2018 as not pressed, noting the petitioner's desire to withdraw the petition via written communication.
Writ Petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
19.08.2024 Ct. No. 14 Sl. No.122 KB
In The High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side
WPA 17499 of 2018
Sumit Pal -Vs-
State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Sudipta Dasgupta …For the Petitioner.
Mr. Ratul Biswas Mr. Kaushik Chowdhury …For the WBBPE.
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already been given appointment and he is not inclined to proceed with the writ petition any further.
A written communication has been made by the petitioner to his learned advocate. Let the same be retained with the record.
The writ petition stands dismissed as ‘not pressed’.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible.
( Amrita Sinha, J.)
Sumit Pal
State of West Bengal
Amrita Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
