Rukshmini Mondal v. State of West Bengal & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
No.01. Ct. No.14. In The High Court At…
No.01. Ct. No.14. In The High Court At…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20.08.2024. AGM Sl. No.01. Ct. No.14.
In The High Court At Calcutta Constitution Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side
WPA 18253 of 2018
Rukshmini Mondal
Vs
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Pankaj Halder. Mr. Neelabha Bera.
……for the petitioner.
Mr. Pantu Deb Roy, Mr. Pannalal Bandopadhyay.
……for the State.
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that he was unable to contact with his clients.
It has been submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of relying upon the report filed by the Assistant Engineer, Kakdwip Sub-Division, PWD dated 14th August, 2024.
The petitioner has already intimated to the authority that she does not have any grievance at present.
In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible.
(Amrita Sinha, J.)
Rukshmini Mondal
The State of West Bengal
Amrita Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court