Dismissed
Barun Kumar Sarkar v. State of West Bengal & Ors.
Calcutta HCWPA/6277/2009
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
null
What the court decided
AI extract
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
29 14.08.2023 Court No. 35 D.Hira
WPA 6277 of 2009
Barun Kumar Sarkar
Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Anil Kumar Chattopadhyay. … for the petitioner
Petitioner is represented.
The writ petitioner has preferred the instant case
being aggrieved by non-consideration of the representation dated 18.12.1991 made before the Secretary, School Education Department, praying for change of option from C.P.F. to G.P.F.
Mr. Chattopadhyay, learned counsel appears for the petitioner and submits that necessary order be passed, as the writ petition may be infructuous due to efflux of time.
Taking into consideration the submissions as above and the facts and circumstances of the case as it transpires of the records, the writ petition is disposed of being infructuous due to efflux of time.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on usual undertaking.
(Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)
Barun Kumar Sarkar
The State of West Bengal
Rai Chattopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court