This single-paragraph order dismisses a writ petition as infructuous because the vacant posts sought by the petitioner had already been filled during the pendency of the proceedings.
None. Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27 14.08.2023 Court No. 35 D.Hira
WPA 6237 of 2009
Nirmal Kumar Biswas
Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Ekramul Bari, Sk. Imtiaj Uddin.
… for the petitioner
Petitioner is represented.
The petitioner has been aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in upholding his prayers for granting permission for filling up the post of nonteaching staff.
Mr. Bari, learned counsel appears for the petitioner and submits that the concerned vacant post have already been filled up, during the pendency of the present writ petition.
He further submits that the writ petition has become infructuous due to efflux of time and necessary order be passed accordingly.
Considering the facts as above, this writ petition is disposed of being infructuous.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on usual undertaking.
(Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)
Nirmal Kumar Biswas
The State of West Bengal
Rai Chattopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
