Disposed

Shankar Prasad Ram v. State of West Bengal & Ors.

Calcutta HC6 Feb 2023WPA/4808/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner, a Group-D staff member appointed after his father's death, sought permanent engagement. With no respondents present, the single judge granted leave for comprehensive representation to the District Inspector of Schools within two weeks, directing a reasoned decision with a hearing opportunity within three months thereafter.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to make comprehensive representation within two weeks; authority directed to decide within twelve weeks after hearing.

Shankar Prasad Ram Vs State of West Bengal… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Calcutta HC (2023)

¶1

ML 26 06.02.2023 adeb

W.P.A. 4808 of 2019

Shankar Prasad Ram

Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶6

Mr. Kishore Dutta Ms. Anuradha Poddar

¶7

….for the petitioner

¶8

After the death of the father of the petitioner on 5^th January, 1990 who was working as Group-D staff of Shri Sanatan Dharma Vidyalaya, Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as “said school”) the petitioner being son of deceased nonteaching staff was allowed to work as Group-D staff with effect from 1^st August, 2004 in the said school.

¶9

It has been submitted by Mr. Kishore Dutta, learned senior advocate representing the petitioner that after being appointed to work as Group-D staff of the said school on 1^st August, 2004 till date petitioner has been discharging duty. On 25^th January, 2019 petitioner made prayer to the teacher-in-charge of the said school for consideration of his engagement on permanent basis. The grievance which has been voiced in this writ petition is till such approach has been made by the petitioner to the teacher-in-charge of the said school the issue remains pending.

¶10

It has also been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that school authority on 1^st February, 2019 has forwarded the relevant documents relating to the service of the

¶11

¶12

petitioner to the office of the respondent no. 3 for due consideration.

¶13

However, no one is representing the Staterespondents as well as school authority today.

¶14

In view of aforesaid facts, this Court grants leave to the petitioner to make comprehensive representation to the District Inspector of Schools (SE), Kolkata within a period of fortnight from this date claiming approval of his engagement as Group-D staff in the said school. If such representation is made within the aforesaid time the respondent no. 3 in his turn shall take decision in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the said school authority within a period of 12 (twelve) weeks from the date of receipt of such representation and the reasoned decision to be communicated to the petitioner within 2 (two) weeks thereafter.

¶15

With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶16

However, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶17

Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied

¶18

for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings.

¶19

(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)

Shankar Prasad Ram v. State of West Bengal & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shankar Prasad Ram v. State of West Bengal & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Baazar Style Retail Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Sk. Azizul Haque Vs Abid Hussaun

Abu Torab Vs Abid Hussain

Ashok Kumar Mistry Vs the State of Wb & Ors.

Anath Bandhu Nandi Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Shiwjee Shaw Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.