The High Court dismissed W.P.A. 1799 of 2015 due to non-prosecution, as the petitioner requested withdrawal of the matter during the hearing without representation from the respondents.
The writ petition stands dismissed on the ground of non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ml06.02.2023 40 Ct.15 rkd
W.P.A. 1799 of 2015
Ashoke Kumar Mistry
-vs-
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Ms. Tapan Kumar Roy, Ms. Alina MOndal
….for the petitioner.
At the time of call Ms. Mondal, learned advocate representing the petitioner submits on instruction that the petitioner does not want to proceed with the matter. However, no one is representing the respondents.
In view of such submission made on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed on the ground of non-prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the learned Advocates for the parties on the usual undertakings.
(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)
Ashoke Kumar Mistry
The State of West Bengal
Saugata Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
