Disposed

Sukur Sekh v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Calcutta HC12 Dec 2023WPA/21934/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking short term mining licence. Liberty granted to implead WBMDTC Ltd. Petitioner directed to submit fresh application. Authority directed to consider application within four weeks and communicate decision within a week.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to implead WBMDTC Ltd. Liberty to file fresh mining licence application; authority to dispose of same within four weeks.

Sukur Sekh Vs State of West Bengal and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Calcutta HC (2023)

¶1

12.12.2023 rc/ct.no.10 Item No.524

¶2

WPA No. 21934 of 2023 Sukur Sekh Versus

¶3

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶4

Mr. Pankaj Halder …for the petitioners Mr. Moniruzzaman …for the State Mr. Sanjoy Saha Mr. Subhasish Bhattacharjee…for the WBMDTC Ltd.

¶5

Report submitted on behalf of the respondents is taken on record.

¶6

On the prayer of the petitioner liberty is granted to implead the West Bengal Mineral Development and Trading Corporation Ltd. as respondent no. 9 in the writ petition. The cause title of the writ petition be amended accordingly. Copy of the writ petition along with all annexures thereto is served upon the learned counsel for the 9^th respondent in Court this day.

¶7

The petitioner seeks grant of short term mining licence and seeks further liberty to file a fresh application in this regard before the 9^th respondent.

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has deposited requisite fees before the authority along with an earlier application for grant of licence on August 23, 2023. The petitioner prays for consideration of the said deposit made by him.

¶9

¶10

It is submitted on behalf of the respondents that the 9^th respondent be directed to consider the application in accordance with law.

¶11

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit an application for grant of short term mining licence before the 9^th respondent within two weeks from date. The 9^th respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the application within four weeks from the date of receipt thereof after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to all the stake holders including the petitioner, in accordance with law.

¶12

The decision taken by the authority shall be communicated to the petitioner within a week thereof.

¶13

With the above observations and directions this writ petition is disposed of.

¶14

There shall be, however, no order as to costs. Since no affidavit is invited, the allegations contained in the petition are deemed not to be admitted.

¶15

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished to the parties upon compliance of necessary formalities.

¶16

(Suvra Ghosh,J)

Sukur Sekh v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sukur Sekh v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prabir Seal and Ors. Vs the State of West Bengal and Anr.

The National Small Industries Corporation Limited Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Anjan Talukder Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Surajit Mukhopaddhaya and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Ashok Kr. Mondal Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Snehungshu Das Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.