The Single Judge Court held that an appeal became infructuous because the parties had obtained a mutual consent decree of divorce pending the appeal.
The appeal was dismissed as infructuous due to the allowance of mutual consent decree.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FAT 535 of 2016
Item-42. 13-03-2023
Sujoy Chatterjee Versus
sg
Ct. 8 Sonali Chatterjee (Mukherjee)
Mr. Abhimanyu Bannerjee, Adv.
…for the appellant
Mr. Rwitendra Banerjee, Adv.
…for the respondent
Mr. Rwitendra Banerjee, learned Counsel representing the
appellant submits that during the pendency of the appeal, the parties applied for a decree of divorce on mutual consent and the said application was allowed on 6th February, 2023.
In view thereof, the appeal has now become infructuous and
stands dismissed.
Photostat copy of the order dated 6th February, 2023 is kept with the record.
(Uday Kumar, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)
Sujoy Chatterjee
Sonali Chatterjee (Mukherjee)
Uday Kumar
Soumen Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
