Special Appeal SA 741 of 1995 was dismissed for non-compliance with the impugned order dated 7th July, 2008, as the appellant failed to take steps to remove defects despite sufficient notice, indicating lack of interest to proceed.
Special Appeal SA 741 of 1995 dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 7th July, 2008.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SA 741 of 1995
Gopal Chandra Nandan
Vs.
Protima Chatterjee
Order dated: 10.03.2023
The appellant is not represented nor any accommodation is prayed for on behalf of the appellant.
The department in its report dated 2nd March, 2023 has stated that the appellant has not complied with the order dated 7th May, 2008.
The appellant has sufficient notice of such non-compliance but did not take any step in the mean time to remove the defects.
It clearly shows that the appellant is not interested to proceed with the matter.
Under such circumstances SA 741 of 1995 is dismissed for non-
compliance of the order dated 7th July, 2008.
(Soumen Sen, J.)
(Uday Kumar, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Special Appeal SA 741 of 1995 should be dismissed due to non-compliance with the order dated 7th July, 2008.
Gopal Chandra Nandan
Protima Chatterjee
Soumen Sen
Uday Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
