Special Appeal admitted by Sambhu Karmakar was dismissed due to the appellant's failure to comply with a prior order dated 4th December 2013, indicating lack of interest in proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SA 189 of 2001
Sambhu Karmakar
Vs. Ajoy Kumar Kuri
Order Dated: 10.03.2023
The appellant is not represented nor any accommodation is prayed for on behalf of the appellant.
The department in its report dated 2nd March, 2023 has stated that the appellant has not complied with the order dated 4th December, 2013.
The appellant has sufficient notice of such non-compliance but did not take any step in the mean time to remove the defects.
It clearly shows that the appellant is not interested to proceed with the matter.
Under such circumstances SA 189 of 2001 stands dismissed for
non-compliance of the order dated 4th December, 2013.
(Soumen Sen, J.)
(Uday Kumar, J.)
Sambhu Karmakar
Ajoy Kumar Kuri
Soumen Sen
Uday Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
