Revision under CRR/1600/2013 in S.S.Binu Vs. The State of West Bengal & Anr. was dismissed for default as the petitioner was absent and no advocate appeared to proceed.
The revision was dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
07.07.2023 Sl. No.06. Mithun. Ct.No.42.
CRR/1600/2013
S.S.Binu Vs. The State of West Bengal & Anr.
Mr.Ayan Bhattacharjee, Adv.
…for the petitioner.
It is submitted by Mr. Bhattacharjee, learned Advocate for the petitioner that he has no instruction to proceed with the instant revision.
The petitioner is not present when the matter is called on for hearing.
No other learned Advocate represents the petitioner.
Therefore, the instant revision is dismissed for default.
( Bibek Chaudhuri, J. )
S.S.Binu
The State of West Bengal
Bibek Chaudhuri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
