The High Court at Calcutta dismissed Criminal Revisional Application C.R.R. 138 of 2021 on the ground that the petitioner was not inclined to proceed with the application.
C.R.R. 138 of 2021 dismissed as not pressed; pending connected applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
02.01.2023
Item No.8 Ct.No.34 dc.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION
C.R.R. 138 of 2021
Hasan Majid
versus
The State of West Bengal & Anr.
In Re : An Application under Section 482 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Mr. Abdul Zahid … For the Petitioner. Mr. Saibal Bapuli, Mr. Arijit Ganguly … For the State.
Affidavit-of-service filed in Court today be kept on record.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not inclined to proceed with the instant revisional application.
Mr. Ganguly, learned advocate appears for the State.
In view of the submission advanced by the learned advocate for the petitioner, the revisional application being CRR 138 of 2021 is dismissed as not pressed.
All pending connected applications, if any, are consequently disposed of.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
Hasan Majid
The State of West Bengal & Anr.
Tirthankar Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
