The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the撤回 revisional application (CRR 127 of 2021) and connected application (CRAN 1 of 2021) as withdrawn by the petitioners after the complainant withdrew the case in the trial court.
The revisional application and connected application were dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
02.01.2023
Item No.6 Ct.No.34 dc.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION
C.R.R. 127 of 2021 with CRAN 1 of 2021
Bharati Jitendra Solanki & Ors. versus
The State of West Bengal & Anr.
In Re : An Application under Sections 401 and 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Mr. Subhojit Seal … For the Petitioners. Mr. Madhusudan Sur, Mr. Dipankar Paramanick … For the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the complainant has already withdrawn the case before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Durgapur.
In view of the aforesaid, learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are not inclined to proceed with the instant revisional application along with the connected application.
Accordingly, the revisional application being CRR 127 of 2021 along with CRAN 1 of 2021 is dismissed as withdrawn.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Bharati Jitendra Solanki
The State of West Bengal
Tirthankar Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
