Court dismissed a revision application by default due to the petitioner's non-appearance despite repeated calls, resulting in vacating the interim order and restoring status quo.
Revision dismissed; interim order vacated; trial directed to proceed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28.08.2023 Sl. No.: 33
Court No.30
BM
CRR 1092 of 2020 +
IA No.: CRAN 1 of 2020 (Old No.: CRAN 3436 of 2020)
Amit Roy
vs.
State of West Bengal & Anr.
Mr. Arijit Ganguly Mr. Sanjib Kumar Dan
… for the State The present revision is of the year 2020 praying for quashing and/or stay of the order dated 08.08.2019 in Misc. Case No.143 of 2018 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 3rd Court, Barrackpore, North 24 Parganas.
As none appears for the the petitioner in spite of repeated calls since the date of listing, the revisional application stands dismissed for default.
Application, if any, connected thereto stands disposed of.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Let a copy of the order be sent to the learned trial court for compliance and to proceed with the trial in accordance with law.
Learned counsel for the State to inform the status of this case to the concerned authority.
( Shampa Dutt (Paul), J. )
Amit Roy
State of West Bengal & Anr.
Shampa Dutt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
