Revision petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to appear in court despite repeated calls. Connected applications and interim orders were also disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28.08.2023 Sl. No.: 31
Court No.30
BM
CRR 1078 of 2020 +
IA No.: CRAN 1 of 2020 (Old No.: CRAN 3311 of 2020)
Haider Ali Khan
vs.
State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Sudip Ghosh
Mr. Bitasok Banerjee
… for the State The present revision is of the year 2020 praying for quashing
of the FIR being Tiljala P.S Case No.166 of 2020 dated 03.07.2020 under Section 120B/506(ii) of the IPC(corresponding to ACGR case No.2937/2020)
As none appears for the the petitioner in spite of repeated calls since the date of listing, the revisional application stands dismissed for default.
Application, if any, connected thereto stands disposed of. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Let a copy of the order be sent to the learned trial court for compliance and to proceed with the trial in accordance with law.
Learned counsel for the State to inform the status of this case to the concerned authority.
( Shampa Dutt (Paul), J. )
Haider Ali Khan
State of West Bengal
Shampa Dutt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
