A revision application for quashing a trial court order was dismissed due to the petitioner's absence after repeated calls.
Revision application dismissed for default; no specific relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28.08.2023 Sl. No.: 30
Court No.30
BM
CRR 1062 of 2020 +
IA No.: CRAN 1 of 2020 (Old No.: CRAN 2870 of 2020)
Debasis Mondal @ Debasish Mondal vs.
State of West Bengal & Anr.
Mr. Arijit Ganguly
… for the State The present revision is of the year 2020 praying for quashing of the order no.34 dated 13.02.2020 passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge cum Fast Track Court-I at Sealdah in connection with criminal case being S.T No.01/10/2019 under Sections 148/149/326/307/427 of IPC read with Section 25(1B)/27 of Arms read with Section 3 & 5 E.S Act.
As none appears for the the petitioner in spite of repeated calls since the date of listing, the revisional application stands dismissed for default.
Application, if any, connected thereto stands disposed of. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Let a copy of the order be sent to the learned trial court for compliance and to proceed with the trial in accordance with law.
Learned counsel for the State to inform the status of this case to the concerned authority.
( Shampa Dutt (Paul), J. )
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Debasis Mondal @ Debasish Mondal
State of West Bengal & Anr.
Shampa Dutt Paul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
