The High Court disposed of a second application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC as infructuous due to the petitioner's prior arrest, dispensing with personal appearance.
Application disposed as infructuous; personal appearance dispensed with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15.02.2023
Serial no.04 Dd Disposed of as infructuous
CRM (A) 350 of 2023
In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Bidhannagar Cyber Crime Police Station, Bidhannagar Police Commissionarate Case/FIR No. 50 of 2022 dated 31.03.2022 under Sections 419/420/120B of the IPC
-And-
In the matter of : Masiul Sarkar
… …Petitioner
Mk. Moinuddin,
Mr. Arshad Hussain, Advocates … … For the Petitioner
Mr. Rudradipta Nandy, ld. APP Ms. Sonali Das, Advocates … …For the State
This is the second application for anticipatory bail.
The Court is informed that the petitioner was
arrested.
There was an order dated February 6, 2023 requiring the petitioner to be personally present.
In view of the arrest of the petitioner, CRM (A) 350 of 2023 is disposed of as infructuous.
Personal appearance of the petitioner is dispensed
with.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
(Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dispose of the reconsideration application for anticipatory bail given the petitioner's arrest.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Masiul Sarkar
State
Debangsu Basak
Md. Shabbar Rashidi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
