Allowed

Zakaria Mollick@Jakariya Mollock v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC13 Feb 2023CRM (A)/596/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a NDPS case, noting the petitioner rebutted the statutory presumption due to lack of nexus between them and the seized commercial quantity of narcotics.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC.

Zakaria Mollick@Jakariya Mollock Vs State of West Bengal — Narcotics (NDPS) | Calcutta HC (2023)

¶1

13.02.2023 Serial no. 06 [Dd] (Anticipatory bail) Allowed )

¶2

CRM (A) 596 of 2023

¶3

In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Sagardighi Police Station Case No. 281 of 2022 dated 02.07.2022 under Sections 21(c)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

¶4

-And-

¶5

In the matter of : Zakaria Mollick @ Jakariya Mollock … … Petitioner

¶6

Mr. Jisin Iqbal Hossain,

¶7

Ms. Chandrima Debnath, Advocates … … For the Petitioner

¶8

Mr. Sudip Ghosh,

¶9

Mr. Apurba Kr. Datta, Advocates … …For the State

¶10

The claim for parity with the other co-accused who was enlarged on anticipatory bail by the order dated February 1, 2023 passed in CRM(A) 409 of 2023 is not being disputed on behalf of the State.

¶11

The police are proceeding on the basis of the statement of the co-accused made while in custody. Police are, at this stage, unable to demonstrate any nexus between the petitioner and the person arrested with the commercial quantity of narcotics and/or the seized commercial quantity of narcotics.

¶12

In such circumstances, we are of the view that the petitioner is able to rebut the presumption under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, 1985.

¶13

Police filed charge sheet.

¶14

Consequently, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶15

¶16

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

¶17

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed .

¶18

CRM (A) 596 of 2023 is disposed of .

¶19

(Debangsu Basak, J.)

¶20

(Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)

Zakaria Mollick@Jakariya Mollock v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Zakaria Mollick@Jakariya Mollock v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sandipan Mukherjee Vs State of West Bengal

Seikh Deloyar Hossain Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Bilal Sk @ Bilal Sk and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal

Soumen Mitra @Suman and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Asim Sk and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal

Jayasree Poriya Bera @ Joyasri Paria Vs State of West Bengal