The court dismissed a revisional application filed by Exide Industries Limited as withdrawn without liberty to file afresh upon receiving written instructions.
Revisional application dismissed as withdrawn without liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
19.1.2023 1 Ct. no. 652 sb
CO 430 of 2021
Exide Industries Limited
Vs.
Urmila Pasari & Ors.
Mr. Piyush Agarwal
Ms. Shrinalli Kajaria …for the petitioner
Ms. Radhita Singh …for the O.P. nos. 1,2 & 3
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to proceed further with the revisional application and wants to withdraw the same without liberty to file afresh.
Let C.O. 430 of 2021 be dismissed as withdrawn without any liberty to file afresh.
Written instruction submitted by the petitioner is taken on record. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
Exide Industries Limited
Urmila Pasari
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
