The High Court at Calcutta dropped the contempt proceeding and discharged the rule issued against the alleged contemners as the parties were no longer interested in proceeding. The application was disposed of without costs.
Contempt proceeding dropped, rule discharged, application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14-09-2022 Item no.4 Subrata Bhattacharyya
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
WPCRC No.22403 of 2000 Sri Asit Kumar Ghosh
-vs-
V.N. Palodia & Anr.
arising out of WPA No.14159 of 1997
None …for the petitioner
None appears for the petitioner as well as for the alleged contemners on call.
It appears that a contempt rule was issued against the alleged contemners vide order dated December 15, 2000.
I feel that the parties are no longer interested to proceed with the instant contempt proceeding.
Accordingly, the contempt proceeding is dropped. The rule is discharged. The contempt application stands disposed of. No order as to costs.
[Rabindranath Samanta, J]
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the instant contempt proceeding should be dropped and the rule discharged given the parties' lack of interest.
Sri Asit Kumar Ghosh
V.N. Palodia & Anr.
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
