Dismissed
Debabrata Tripathy & Ors. v. Tamalika Seth
Calcutta HCCPAN/72/2003
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Item no.11 Subrata Bhattacharyya IN THE HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
Item no.11 Subrata Bhattacharyya IN THE HIGH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14-09-2022 Item no.11
Subrata Bhattacharyya
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
CPAN No.72 of 2003 Debabrata Tripathy &Ors. -vs-
Smt. Tamalika Seth
arising out of WPA No.637 of 1992
None …for the petitioners
To press the contempt application, none represents the petitioners.
The petitioners, by way of this contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India filed on December 8, 2003, sought for punishment of the alleged contemner/respondent concerned in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated July 27, 1992 passed by this court in WP No.637(W) of 1992.
It appears that since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it.
I feel that the petitioners are no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.
Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioners.
[Rabindranath Samanta, J]
2
Debabrata Tripathy & Ors.
Smt. Tamalika Seth
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court