intimated the writ petitioner that the higher scale of pay of the writ petitioner as has been fixed was not in order and accordingly the writ petitioner finding no other alternative refunded a sum of Rs.4,80,356/- to the respondent authorities. It is the further case of the petitioner that subsequently on 19.03.2014, the respondents authorities refixed her pay with effect from 12.07.2012 at Rs.29,090/- with effect from 01.07.2012, and in accordance with such fixation the school authority, where the writ petitioner was employed, submitted arrear claim of the writ petitioner to the tune of Rs.37,035/- and Rs.4,80,356/- as has been refunded by the writ petitioner for the periods mentioned hereinabove. It is the further case of the writ petitioner that under cover of letter dated 11.05.2015, the respondents/State Authority intimated the school authority, where the writ petitioner was employed, that the petitioner’s claim to the tune of Rs.4,80,356/- is admissible. It is contended that in spite of issuance of such letter the above mentioned arrear claims were never disbursed in favour of the present writ petitioner and thus finding no other alternative the petitioner has approached this Court for the reliefs as mentioned above and as specifically mentioned in the prayer portion of the writ petition.
