on account of his immoral life is not perverse since in course of field enquiry not only several people stated adverse against the character of the present petitioner but also from the successive affidavits as submitted before the Board it would reveal that the full blooded brothers and sisters of the petitioner stated it categorically that the present petitioner is a drunkard and resides with a widow and that he has left his residence 15 years back. It is contended further on behalf of the opposite party nos. 1 and 2 that from the recitals of the three Waqf Deeds, it would reveal that while executing the said three deeds, it was the desire of the Waqif that a certain portion of the earnings of the Waqf property shall also be spent for the benefits of his own family members in accordance with their respective shares. It is thus, argued that since in the case in hand all the family members of the present petitioner as well as the opposite party no.3 have categorically stated before the Board that on account of characterlessness of the present petitioner, he cannot be appointed as a Mutawalli and on the contrary the opposite party no.3 be appointed as a Mutawalli and thus the Board as well as the Learned Tribunal committed no irregularity or illegality by appointing the present opposite party no.3 as a Mutawalli denying the claim of the petitioner. It is thus, submitted that it is a fit case for dismissal of the instant revisional application.
