The High Court dismissed a writ petition for default due to the petitioner's consistent absence, treating it as a loss of interest, and vacated any interim order.
Writ application WPA 15796 of 2004 and CAN 1 of 2004 dismissed for default; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11.11.2022 Court No.12 Item no.54 B.M.J.R
WPA 15796 of 2004 With CAN 1 of 2004 (Old No.CAN 10683 of 2004)
Sk. Jiaul Haque Vs. State of West Bengal
At the time of call none appears on behalf of the petitioner. It reveals that on the earlier occasions i.e. on 07.11.2022 the petitioner was also absent. This Court has reason to believe that probably the writ petitioner has lost his interest in the instant matter.
In view of such, the writ application being WPA 15796 of 2004 is dismissed for default. Accordingly, the application being CAN 1 of 2004 (Old No.CAN 10683 of 2004) is also dismissed.
Interim order, if therebe any, hereby stands vacated.
(Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)
2
Sk. Jiaul Haque
State of West Bengal
Partha Sarathi Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
