The revisional application (CRR 4229 of 2011 with CRAN 1 of 2012) was dismissed as infructuous. The court held that since the trial court had acquitted the accused, the revision could no longer subsist.
CRR 4229 of 2011 and CRAN 1 of 2012 dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sl. 68 25.3.2022 Court No.41 SD
CRR 4229 of 2011 With CRAN 1 of 2012 (Old No. 1205 of 2012) (Via Video Conference)
In the matter of: Bhabani Prosad Mondal & Anr.
… Petitioners.
Mr. Rajendra Banerjee
… for the Petitioners.
Mr. Madhusudan Sur Mr. Manoranjan Mahata
… for the State.
It is submitted by Mr. Rajendra Banerjee, learned counsel for the petitioners, that the trial court proceeded with the criminal case and ultimately acquitted the accused. Accordingly, the revisional application has now become infructuous and he prayed for dismissal of the same as infructuous.
The State is represented.
Accordingly, CRR 4229 of 2011 along with CRAN 1 of 2012 stands dismissed as infructuous.
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
Bhabani Prosad Mondal & Anr.
State
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
