The Court dismissed the revisional application finding a change of circumstance since the petitioners approached the Court, noting no interference is called for.
Revisional application CRR 795 of 2020 is dismissed; interim order, if any, is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11.03. 2022 item No.63. n.b. ct. no. 34
CRR 795 of 2020
Sandip Sarkar @ Bapi Sarkar & Anr. Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Anwar Hossain Ms. Sujata Das
…..for the State
The present revisional application reflects that till date none appears on behalf of the petitioners to present the case.
A report has been submitted by Ms. Sujata Das, learned advocate for the State.
Report reflects that already charge-sheet has been submitted in connection with this instant case, I find that there has been a change of circumstance since the petitioners’ approached before this Court. No interference is called for
Accordingly, CRR 795 of 2020 is dismissed.
All pending connected applications, if any, are consequently disposed of.
Interim order, if any, is hereby vacated.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
( Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revisional application concerning a change of circumstance calls for interference.
Sandip Sarkar @ Bapi Sarkar & Anr.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Tirthankar Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
