Revisional application dismissed for default due to petitioner's continued non-appearance despite summons. No substantive decision on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
19 8.4.2022 sb
CRR 3090 of 2011
In the matter of : BMA Wealth Creators Ltd. & ors.
…Petitioners
Mr. Bidyut Kumar Roy Mr. Pratick Bose ….for the State
Petitioner is not represented even on the second call. On earlier occasion, the petitioner also not represented and it appears from the order dated 9.1.2011, that Mr. Jha, learned advocate for the petitioner stated that the matter has been amicably settled out of Court.
The learned advocate for the State is represented. The appointment of the State advocates may be regularised.
Revisional application accordingly stands dismissed for default.
Let a copy of this order be send to the learned court below. The department is directed to do the needful.
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
BMA Wealth Creators Ltd. & ors.
The State
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
