In an application under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of a criminal case based on IPC provisions, the Court held that it was not a fit case to exercise jurisdiction and dismissed the plea on merit.
Application for quashing of case under Sections 120B/420/406/34 IPC dismissed on merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
34 13.7 akb 2022
Ct. No. 40
C.R.R. 2937 of 2012 With C.R.R. 2938 of 2012
In the matter of : Srivatsan
….Petitioner
None appears on behalf of the petitioner. On previous occasion also none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
The instant application is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 praying for quashing of case No. C/96/2012 under Sections 120B/420/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code now pending in the Court of learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 6th Court at Calcutta.
On perusal of the application as well as annexures filed therein it appears that this is not a fit case where jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure can be exercised.
Accordingly, the instant application stands dismissed on
merit.
( Sugato Majumdar, J. )
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the inherent powers of the High Court under Section 482 CrPC are exercisable to quash the pending criminal case.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Srivatsan
Sugato Majumdar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
