The application proceeds by default as the petitioner failed to appear or seek accommodation, despite repeated calls, resulting in the dismissal of WPA 5813 of 2003.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
116 13.07.2022. C.P.A.N. 509 of 2004 ab In Ct. 40
WPA 5813 of 2003 Supriya Chhandogi Vs. Timir Baran Samanta
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on
repeated calls.
No accommodation is sought for.
Accordingly, the contempt application is
dismissed for default.
There shall be no order as to costs.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Sugato Majumdar, J.)
Supriya Chhandogi
Timir Baran Samanta
Sugato Majumdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
