Dismissed
Shyamal Mondal v. Samar Ghosh
Calcutta HCCPAN/1922/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
C.P.A.N. 1922 of 2005 In WPA 268 of 1985…
What the court decided
AI extract
C.P.A.N. 1922 of 2005 In WPA 268 of 1985…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
173 13.07.2022. C.P.A.N. 1922 of 2005 ab In Ct. 40
WPA 268 of 1985 Shyamal Mondal Vs. Samar Ghosh
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on
repeated calls.
No accommodation is sought for.
Accordingly, the contempt application is
dismissed for default.
There shall be no order as to costs.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this
order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Sugato Majumdar, J.)
Shyamal Mondal
Samar Ghosh
Sugato Majumdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court