The court dismissed the revisional petition (CRR 264 of 2019) as withdrawn by the petitioner, who chose to agitate his contentions before the trial court instead. The petitioner was granted liberty to make a fresh prayer.
Revisional petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to make fresh prayer before the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20 16.6.2022 sb
CRR 264 of 2019
In the matter of : Kalyan Krishna Nandi
…….Petitioner (In person)
Mr. Kalyan Krishna Nandi ...for the Petitioner ( In person)
Mr. Prasun Kr. Dutta, Ld. APP Mr. Santanu Deb Roy …for the State
The petitioner appears in person and submits that he does not want to proceed with the contentions made in the revisional application and he want to agitate the same before the trial court.
Accordingly, CRR 264 of 2019 is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to make fresh prayer before the trial court.
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revisional petition can be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh prayer in trial court.
Kalyan Krishna Nandi
State
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
