Disposed
Santanu Bhattacharya v. Bajaj Finance Ltd.
Calcutta HCCRR/471/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Court No.29 Item No. 71 Ali C.R.R 471 of…
What the court decided
AI extract
Court No.29 Item No. 71 Ali C.R.R 471 of…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15.06.2022 Court No.29 Item No. 71 Ali
In the matter of: Santanu Bhattacharya ………petitioner. Mr. S. Sarkar Mr. Sourav Mondal Mr. Diprav Deb ……..for the petitioner
On being instructed, Mr. Santanu Bhattacharya, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of the proceedings matter has been amicably settled between the parties and he has paid the entire loan amount and the opposite party No. 1, Bajaj Finance Ltd. has issued a 'No Dues Certificate’.
In view of the above, petitioner does not want to proceed further with the present proceeding.
CRR 471 of 2020 is dismissed as withdrawn. The copy of ‘No Dues Certificate’ issued by opposite party Bajaj Finance Ltd. is kept with the record.
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
Santanu Bhattacharya
Bajaj Finance Ltd.
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court