This order dismissed a Contested Revisional Reference for default as the petitioner was absent and no accommodation was sought on their behalf.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15.6.2022 Court No.29 Sl. No. 6 SD
CRR 4 of 2018
In the matter of: M/s. Electrosteel Casting Ltd. ….petitioner. Mr. Avishek Sinha … for the State. Petitioner is not represented. No accommodation is sought for on behalf of the petitioner. State is being represented by Mr. Avishek Sinha, learned counsel.
In view of the above, CRR 4 of 2018 is dismissed for default.
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
M/s. Electrosteel Casting Ltd.
State
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
Sudhanshu Tandon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
