Contempt application filed for non-compliance of an order dated September 25, 1998, was dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner, with the court noting the petitioner was no longer interested in proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20-09-2022 Item no.15
Subrata Bhattacharyya
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
CPAN No.776 of 2000 Sri Dilip Kumar Singha
-vsv-
Dr. Rupayan Bhattacharya & Anr.
arising out of WPA No.17492 of 1998
None …for the petitioner
To press the contempt application, none represents the petitioner.
The petitioner, by way of this contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 dated April 28, 2000, sought for punishment of the alleged contemners/respondents concerned in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated September 25, 1998 passed by this court in WP No.17492(W) of 1998.
It appears that since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it.
I feel that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.
Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner.
[Rabindranath Samanta, J]
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a contempt application should be proceeded with when the petitioner fails to appear.
Whether an application for non-compliance of earlier orders can be dismissed for inaction.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri Dilip Kumar Singha
Dr. Rupayan Bhattacharya
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
