Contempt application dismissed for non-appearance of petitioners after inactivity despite filing.
Contempt application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
19-09-2022 Item no.9 Subrata Bhattacharyya
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Special Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
CPAN No.215 of 2000 Md. Mannan Ali & Ors. -vs-
Sri Sanat Pramanick
arising out of CR No.14738(W) of 1985
None …for the petitioners
To press the contempt application, none represents the petitioners.
The petitioners, by way of this contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 filed on January 31, 2000, sought for punishment of the alleged contemner/respondent concerned in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated October 8,, 1999 passed by this court in CR No.14738(W) of 1985.
It appears that since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it.
I feel that the petitioners are no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.
Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioners.
[Rabindranath Samanta, J]
2
Md. Mannan Ali & Ors.
Sri Sanat Pramanick
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
