The High Court at Calcutta dismissed a contempt application for non-appearance of the petitioner. The court opined that the petitioner was no longer interested in proceeding with the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20-09-2022 Item no.13
Subrata Bhattacharyya
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
CPAN No.679 of 2000 Smt. Molly Mandal -vsvD.M. Kanwar & Anr. arising out of WPA No.9545 of 1999
None …for the petitioner
To press the contempt application, none represents the petitioner.
The petitioner, by way of this contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 dated April 11, 2000, sought for punishment of the alleged contemners/respondents concerned in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated January 19, 2000 passed by this court in WP No.9545(W) of 1999.
It appears that since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it.
I feel that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.
Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner.
[Rabindranath Samanta, J]
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 should be dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Molly Mandal
D.M. Kanwar
Anr.
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
