Dismissed
Nihar Ranjan Ghosh v. Apurba Sen
Calcutta HCCPAN/473/2002
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Item no.18 Subrata Bhattacharyya IN THE HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
Item no.18 Subrata Bhattacharyya IN THE HIGH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27-09-2022 Item no.18 Subrata Bhattacharyya
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Special Jurisdiction Appellate Side
CPAN No.473 of 2002 Nihar Ranjan Ghosh
-vs-
Mr. Apurba Sen
arising out of WPA No.14175 of 1995
None …for the petitioner
To press the contempt application, none represents the petitioner.
The petitioner, by way of this contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India filed on April 10, 2002, sought for punishment of the alleged contemner/respondent concerned in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated March 31, 1997 passed by this court in CO No.14175(W) of 1995.
While the contempt application was filed, the petitioner was aged about 41 years. Now, he is 61 years of age.
It appears that since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it.
I feel that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.
Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner.
[Rabindranath Samanta, J]
2
Nihar Ranjan Ghosh
Mr. Apurba Sen
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court