The High Court at Calcutta dismissed a contempt application for non-prosecution, pending the submission of written instructions by the petitioners' counsel indicating the applicants decided not to proceed.
Contempt application dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22-09-2022 Item no.20 Subrata Bhattacharyya
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction Appellate Side
CPAN No.195 of 2019 Dipankar Ghosh & Anr.
-vs-
Dr. Jayashree Ray Chowdhury & Anr. arising out of WPA No.24106 of 2009
Mr. Arunava Banerjee Ms. Mamata Dutta …for the petitioners
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits, on instructions, that the contempt applicants have decided not to proceed with the instant contempt application. In such context, he submits the written instructions of his clients.
In view of the submission, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Let the written instructions be taken on record.
Certified copy of this order, if applied for, shall be given to the parties.
[Rabindranath Samanta, J]
2
Dipankar Ghosh & Anr.
Dr. Jayashree Ray Chowdhury & Anr.
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
