The court disposed of the contempt application where the impugned order was found to be substantially complied with by the alleged contemnor.
Contempt application disposed of as the impugned order was substantially complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14 20.07.2022 Ct. No.10 b.das
CPAN 9 of 2022 in WPA 3430 of 2021
Sudharani Mondal & Ors. Vs.
Prabir Kr. Bagchi
Mr. Sankar Paul Mr. Mukul Biswas Ms. T. Sarkar …for the applicants/petitioners.
Mr. Ansar Mandal Ms. S. Bhattacharyya …for the contemnor/OP.
Affidavit of service in connection with the contempt application filed by the petitioners is taken on record.
Copy of the order issued by the Executive Engineer, Nadia Highway Division No. II, P.W. (Roads), Directorate is also taken on record.
It appears that the order under contempt has been substantially complied with by the alleged contemnor.
In view of the same, the contempt application being CPAN 9 of 2022 is disposed of.
Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Suvra Ghosh, J.)
Suvra Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
