The Court examined compliance with a prior order in a writ petition. Upon perusal of the authority's order, it found substantial compliance and dropped the contempt proceeding against the alleged contemnor.
The contempt proceeding (CPAN 390 of 2022) was dropped and the application was disposed of as the authority had substantially complied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
04 jdt.
19.07.2022 jb.
CPAN 390 of 2022 in W.P.A. 2267 of 2022
Mr. Dilip Kr. Samanta
Mr. Ashis Kr. Pal …. For the Applicant/Petitioner
Mr. Chandi Charan De …. For the alleged Contemnor
Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the applicant/petitioner is taken on record. Affidavit of compliance submitted by the alleged contemnor is also taken on record.
It is submitted on behalf of the alleged contemnor that in compliance with the order of this Court the representation submitted by the petitioner has been considered and disposed of by the alleged contemnor.
Per contra, learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner submits that the order of the Court has not been complied with by the authority in considering the representation submitted by the petitioner.
2
Upon perusal of the order passed by the authority in terms of the direction of this Court passed on 21st February, 2022 in W.P.A. 2267 of 2022, this Court is of the view that the order under contempt has been substantially complied with by the alleged contemnor.
In view of the same, the contempt proceeding is dropped and the contempt application being CPAN 390 of 2022 is disposed of.
(Suvra Ghosh, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the authority substantially complied with the order of this Court by considering the petitioner's representation.
Dilip Kr. Samanta
Ashis Kr. Pal
Suvra Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
