Partly allowed

M/S Bihani Chemical Industries P Ltd. & Asnr v. Firs Labour Court & Ors.

Calcutta HC19 Jul 2022WPA/4741/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed substitution of parties in WPA No. 4741 of 2014 due to expiration of respondent no. 3. It disposed of WPA No. 4741 of 2014 and CAN No. 2 of 2022 based on a June 29, 2022 settlement agreement, ordered release of the bank guarantee, and disposed of WPA No. 3476 of 1998 accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Application for substitution allowed; Writ petitions disposed per settlement; Bank guarantee released; Connected application disposed without costs.

M/S Bihani Chemical Industries P Ltd. & Asnr Vs Firs… — Service and Employment | Calcutta HC (2022)

¶1

19.07.2022 rc/ct.no.10 Item No.01

¶2

WPA No. 4741 of 2014 With CAN No. 1 of 2019 (Old No.CAN/9853/2019) And

¶3

CAN No. 2 of 2022 Messrs Bihani Chemical Industries (P) Ltd. & Anr. Versus First Labour Court & Ors. And WPA No. 3476 of 1998 With CAN No. 1 of 1998 (Old No. CAN/4831/1998) Messrs Bihani Chemical Industries (P) Ltd. & Anr. Versus State of West Bengal & Ors.

¶4

Mr. Ranjay De …for the petitioners

¶5

Mr. Nayan Rakshit ….for the respondents no. 3

¶6

Re : CAN No. 1 of 2019 (Old No.CAN/9853/2019)

¶7

The original copy of the application is not with the record. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant/petitioner produces a photocopy of the application which is treated as the original copy of the application till the original copy of the application is traced out. Let the said photocopy of the application be taken on record.

¶8

This is an application for substitution.

¶9

The applicants pray for their substitution in place of the respondent no. 3. who has expired during pendency of the writ petition.

¶10

¶11

The substitution petition has been filed within the statutory period of time.

¶12

In view of the same CAN No. 1 of 2019 (Old No.CAN/9853/2019) is allowed.

¶13

The cause title of the writ petition be amended accordingly.

¶14

Re : WPA No. 4741 of 2014 And CAN No. 2 of 2022

¶15

It is submitted by the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the respondent no. 3 that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled. The parties pray for disposal of the writ petition in terms of the Memorandum of Settlement by and between the parties dated June 29, 2022.

¶16

By an order dated November 16, 2014 passed by a Coordinate Bench in W.P.No.4741(W) of 2014, the order impugned under Section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act was stayed subject to the condition that the petitioners shall pay a sum of Rs.1.03 lakh to the private respondent within a week from date and shall secure the balance amount either by furnishing a bank guarantee to the satisfaction of the Registrar General of this Court or making a cash deposit with the learned Registrar General within a period of three weeks from the date of payment of Rs.1.03 lakh. The bank

¶17

¶18

guarantee was furnished before the learned Registrar General in compliance with the said order and was renewed from time to time.

¶19

Admittedly the amount decided in the Memorandum of Settlement has been received by the authorised representative of the respondents.

¶20

In view of the submission made by the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties, the writ petition being WPA No. 4741 of 2014 is disposed of in terms of the Memorandum of Settlement dated June 29, 2022.

¶21

The connected application being CAN No. 2 of 2022 is disposed of accordingly.

¶22

The bank guarantee furnished by the petitioners before the learned Registrar General of this Court be released.

¶23

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished to the parties upon compliance of necessary formalities.

¶24

Re : WPA No. 3476 of 1998 With CAN No. 1 of 1998 (Old No. CAN/4831/1998)

¶25

In view of disposal of the writ petition being WPA No. 4741 of 2014 no further relief is required to be granted to the petitioners in the instant writ petition.

¶26

¶27

Hence, WPA No. 3476 of 1998 is disposed of without any order as to costs.

¶28

The connected application being CAN No. 1 of 1998 (Old No. CAN/4831/1998) is disposed of accordingly.

¶29

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished to the parties upon compliance of necessary formalities.

¶30

(Suvra Ghosh,J)

M/S Bihani Chemical Industries P Ltd. & Asnr v. Firs Labour Court & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Bihani Chemical Industries P Ltd. & Asnr v. Firs Labour Court & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sk. Abdur Rouf Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Anima Basu Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Debdas Mondal and Another Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Abdur Rashid Molla@Md Abdur Rashid Molla Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Sisir Kumar Ghosh Vs Ashim Kumar Pal

Tapas Kumar Panda and Ors. Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors.